Evaluation Methodology and Evaluation Training  
     home | About us | Assignments | Training | Articles | Contact us | 
» EC Projects for Asylum Seekers and Displaced Persons
    home » Assignments » EC Projects for Asylum Seekers and Displaced Persons » 
EC Projects for Asylum Seekers and Displaced Persons
Co-financing Support European NGO's
Evaluation of PSO Programme
Swiss NGOs' Best Practice
Programme and policy evaluation of the NMCP
Rio Grande Valley Project Evaluation
IPTA/OE Evaluation
Facilitation of Self-evaluation El Taller NGO
IPTA/OL Evaluation
Social Action Programme (SAP-II) Pakistan
Population Survey Northern and Central Oman
Socio-economic and Demographic Base-line survey Senegal
HIV/AIDS Share-net Evaluation
China Country-led Evaluation
Result-oriented Planning by Royal Netherlands' Embassies
MIS Dutch Minstry of Foreign Affairs
Performance and Impact Evaluation for PLAN Bolivia and The Netherlands

Evaluation of 1998 and 1999 projects benefiting asylum-seekers, displaced persons and refugees  Printer-friendly Version
 

Year:         2001-2002
Client:     European Community, DG JAI
Country:   Members of the EU
Value TA:  ?220,270

This evaluation concerned all projects in member states co-financed in 1998 and 1999 under budgetlines B3-4113, B5-803 and B7-6008. As an important part of the evaluation took place through questionnaires, a pilot phase was included for in-depth interviews and questionnaire development and testing. Because the evaluation could only start in the beginning of 2001 and because the turnover of staff within the projects that were evaluated proved to be rather high, data collection was not always easy and quite some time had sometimes to be spent on finding the persons who were familiar with the projects. Furthermore, the large number of languages involved (11) posed some special problems, especially during the file studies.

An important finding of the evaluation concerned the long time needed to adapt organisations, rules and procedures to new policies. As many Member States kept on adjusting policies, implementational capacity sometimes was reduced for prolonged periods of time. Further it was established that the innovative projects that had been supported by the European Union, not only were highly appreciated by the organisations concerned but also had been duplicated quite generally thus yielding a considerable multiplier effect. An outright negative conclusion concerned the financial procedures of the European Commission used when supporting these projects. These procedures were considered extremely bureaucratic, burdensome, slow and without apparent logic.

 

   home | About us | Assignments | Training | Articles | Contact us | 

   ©  2024 Especs ^ Go top ^